HOUSING CONNECTOR

AI assistant home with suggested starting points
Housing match cards in the chat
Application step tracker inside a dedicated chat
FAQs and resources center
RoleProduct / UX designer
ClientHousing Connector, via Develop for Good

TimelineSummer 2026
Team size10 people

SkillsUX Research, Conversational & AI Design, Prototyping, Design Systems
ToolsFigma, FigJam, Notion

The problem

Renters facing housing instability struggle to find a fit, decode applications, and get steady support along the way.

The solution

An AI assistant inside the Renter Hub app that personalizes search, explains applications, and always hands off to a human.

The outcome

~75% helpful

of testers found the experience and features helpful

Engineering handoff

prioritized V1 plan + full component library

12,500+ renters

in the Renter Hub community it’s built to serve

01 | OVERVIEW

A guided assistant that helps renters find, understand, and complete housing applications, without ever replacing the people who support them.

Housing Connector is a tech-for-good nonprofit that works directly with property partners to open up housing for the people who need it most, and has helped more than 12,500 individuals find stable housing. Our brief was deliberately open: how should AI assistance work for people navigating housing instability?

Over one summer, a team of ten (a PM, a design manager and eight designers) researched the space, set rules for how the AI should behave, and designed five connected features for the Renter Hub mobile app.

Housing preference question inside the chat
Ask, don’t form-fill
AI explanation of why a property matches
Explain every match
Application checklist
Guide each application
FAQ accordion
Back it up with resources

My focusResource & FAQ Center

Where I led the design.I designed the Resource & FAQ Center, the place renters land when they need more than the assistant can give: guides, local resources, forms, and quick answers, reachable from the profile and from inside a chat. I also worked with the team on research, the AI guidelines, and testing.

02 | CONTEXT

Design Context

Client

A nonprofit with scaleHousing Connector partners with property managers and case managers so renters with barriers can access housing.

Challenge

Few peers to copyAI help for housing instability has few precedents, so we had to define how it should behave, not just how it looks.

Constraints

Fit what existsIt had to live inside the Renter Hub mobile app, follow Housing Connector’s brand, and be ready for engineers to build.

Who we designed for

Renters

Often in survival modeVaried digital literacy and little time or background in housing paperwork.

Case managers

Stretched thinThe people renters rely on. We interviewed ten to understand where support breaks down.

Housing Connector team

Needs to build itAn engineering and product team who needed a clear, prioritized, buildable V1.

03 | PROBLEM

Housing search is hard to navigate, applications are hard to understand, and help is hard to reach.

Finding a suitable home is difficult

“Clients will choose a unit that is 6 miles away and close to a bus route over units 2 miles from their job.”

71%struggle to find housing that fits their needs
Applications are hard to decode

Complicated language, limited background knowledge, and low digital literacy discourage renters from finishing.

70%say it would help if AI explained requirements
Support isn’t consistent

“The best support is equipping renters with knowledge, because many have simply been stuck in survival mode.” Case manager

No central place to turn when stuck
AI is an opening, with limits

Case managers expect openness to AI, especially from younger renters, as long as it feels approachable.

Supplement support, don’t replace it

How we learned it

Secondary research

SWOT + 6 competitorsPlus 9 resources from Housing Connector, including past UX research.

Interviews

10 case managersWho work with Housing Connector to support renters.

Survey

30+ rentersResponding via a survey posted inside the Renter Hub platform.

User testing

13 tests12 unmoderated and 1 moderated session with renters.

Affinity map
Affinity map grouping research notes into themes such as finding suitable housing, document requirements and AI familiarity

The insight that shaped everything

Renters seem to trust AI, but still want a human available. That became our design principle: the assistant helps, and people decide.

63%

trust AI to autofill their application from provided materials

04 | PROCESS

Setting Rules for the AI First

Before drawing screens, we mapped the product and decided how the assistant should behave. For renters who are already overwhelmed, a confusing or overconfident AI would do harm.

Information architecture
Information architecture: AI chatbot branching into resources, onboarding tutorial, housing search and application status tracker

Naming

“AI Assistant”Be transparent it’s AI. No face or human name, and not “agent”, which could be mistaken for a real estate agent.

Icon

Sparkle + messageA sparkle marks an AI feature and a message icon marks the chat. We avoided abstract imagery.

Tone

Direct and neutralPlain words, no jargon, and clear that it’s an assistant that can’t replace humans.

Do

  • Redirect renters to human staff
  • Explain and simplify housing terms
  • Handle monotonous tasks
  • Recommend the next action
  • Link users to relevant pages and resources

Don’t

  • Predict or guess the cause of a rejection, or the chance of approval
  • Communicate with case or property managers without the renter
  • Make decisions on behalf of users
  • Hallucinate
  • Give black-and-white answers to contextual questions

Design parameters

It never acts without consent.It can explain, draft and recommend next steps, and it always points renters back to their case manager for final calls.

From Lo-fi to Mid-fi

We sketched layouts and AI features, evaluated each concept as a team, and kept the ones that best met user needs. In mid-fi we then connected our individual flows into one assistant, adding brand color, typography and interactive prototypes to test the whole journey.

Low-fidelity explorations
Four low-fidelity chatbot wireframes: chat, rejection reasons, application status and email drafting

1. Sketch

Explore layouts, chat patterns and AI features.

2. Decide

Evaluate concepts as a team against user needs.

3. Connect

Merge separate flows into one coherent assistant.

4. Test

Prototype, then watch renters use it.

What Testing Told Us

We ran 13 user tests on the interactive prototype. People liked it, but we kept going.

12/14

(~85%) said onboarding was helpful

10/14

(~71%) found the AI insights helpful

9/14

(~64%) would trust the AI insights

7/8

(~87%) found application summary and draft message preview helpful

Testing Revealed Gaps

Pinned message banner in an application chat
Pinned messages
What we heard

Some interactions were hidden or unclear. Users didn’t know they could pin a message, and the checklist didn’t read as interactive.

“I didn’t know there was a pin message feature.” Unmoderated user 10

What we changed

Clearer interaction cues so key actions are discoverable.

Application step list
Application steps
What we heard

Language was confusing or vague. “Hamburger menu” was unfamiliar, and “Let’s break down your step” didn’t say which step.

“‘Freeform question’ phrasing could be puzzling to some users.” Unmoderated user 4

What we changed

Specific, actionable language that names the step and the next action.

Housing preference question with multiple choices
Housing preferences
What we heard

Renters wanted richer preferences. Amenities, housing type and accessibility needs all mattered.

“I have a big dog and need a house with a yard.” Moderated user 1

What we changed

Expanded filters for housing type, amenities, pets and accessibility.

05 | SOLUTION

Five connected features, one assistant.

1. Guided Onboarding

Insight

60% had never used a chatbot, but only 2 of 15 were negative.

Design

A short, skippable walkthrough introduces suggested prompts, voice input, and what the AI can and can’t do, so renters start with confidence.

Saved homes screen prompting the tutorial
Entry from saved homes
Tutorial tooltip pointing to suggested prompts
Learn the prompts
Voice input tooltip
Try voice input
Notice that AI can make mistakes and personal information is not shared
Set AI expectations

2. Personalized Housing Search

Insight

71% struggle to find housing that fits. Real needs, like commute and pets, rarely fit a filter.

Design

Short questions build a profile. The assistant filters options, recommends what renters may be eligible for, and explains why each property matched.

Questionnaire step about housing vouchers
Quick questions
Property recommendation cards
Matched homes
AI explanation of top match criteria
Why it matched
Available units table
Available units

3. Guided Applications

Insight

70% said explaining requirements and documents would help.

Design

Each application gets its own chat with a step tracker, document checklist, uploads, pinned messages and a plain-language explainer for confusing sections.

Five-step application tracker
Track the steps
Document checklist
Check documents
Upload documents dialog
Upload for help
Review request options for the case manager
Share with a case manager

4. Streamlined Communication

Insight

Communication gaps stall applications between renters, property managers and case managers.

Design

Nudges and drafts. Notifications re-engage renters, and AI drafts emails that renters review and send, so the assistant never acts for them.

Lock screen notifications from Housing Connector
Notification nudges
Assistant response after a rejection
Next steps after a rejection
Email draft to a case manager
Draft, review, send
Email draft open in the mail app
Hand off to email

5. Resource & FAQ CenterMy focus

Insight

“The best support is equipping renters with knowledge.” Case managers wanted renters to need them less for basic questions.

Design

One searchable hub with a Resources / FAQs toggle, local help grouped by need, and quick answers. It’s reachable from the profile and from inside chats.

Profile screen with FAQs and resources entry
From the profile
Application chat with resource links
From a chat
Resources list by category
Find local help
FAQ accordion
Get quick answers

A Design System Built For Handoff

With ten people designing in parallel, we built a component library and style guide on top of Housing Connector’s brand so the five flows feel like one product, and so engineers can build it.

Component library and style guide
Style guide with AI assistant icons, buttons, property card, email template, FAQ and icon set

06 | IMPACT & TAKEAWAYS

Impact

Validated

About 75% of participants found the experience and features helpful.

Recognized

Presented at Develop for Good’s Demo Day, with positive feedback from stakeholders including HPE and Bloomberg.

Handed off

Delivered a Figma file, Notion documentation and a prioritized V1 plan to the lead engineer.

These designs are gold! I’m excited to turn our designers’ cohesive vision into reality.Jan Van Bruggen, Lead Engineer, Housing Connector
They helped us understand how transformational the solution they arrived at could be.Doug Minkler, Director of Product & Technology, Housing Connector

What’s Next

What I Learned

Trust is the feature

For vulnerable users, consent, transparency and a human handoff mattered more than what the AI could do.

Rules before screens

Setting AI guidelines first kept ten designers aligned and made every later decision easier.

Words are design

Testing showed small wording choices, like “hamburger menu,” decided whether a feature was found at all.